Previous 11 - 20 Next
One of the big problems with "climate change" is that the data used to calculate global temperature change is "cooked." It's fudged. That's what the Climategate scandal was all about -- the so-called "scientists" at East Anglia were fudging the data to make global warming appear to be real. But using unfudged data, it's different, I looked up average temptertures for Green Bay, WI (because I live near Green Bay), and using raw data -- simply reports from the local airport weather station, averaged out -- January through November 2014 average temps were 3.28 degrees (F) below normal. That is huge for a variation from average temperatures. Just from going outside, I knew the year was cold; but 3.28 degrees is a ridiculously high variation from normal. Now the Algorians will point out that conditions at one weather station do not necessarily match those for the entire world. But it starts getting suspicious when they keep talking about warming (e.g., "2014 has been the warmest year ever recorded"), and all I experience is cold. Also, the Algorians will claim that the cold is due to "climate change," just as warming would be. The trouble with that is that their computer models, based on the greenhouse effects of CO2, predict ever warmer temps. Their models are wrong, as Beisner points out, in that they predict warming and the official temp numbers are flat. But the models are much more wrong when the temps are going down. It disturbs me immensely when the lefty liars keep telling people how we're all gonna die due to Global Warming, and people believe them, when all you have to do is go outside once in a while to realize that what they're saying is a pack of lies.
So, once again, some morally-bankrupt libertarian fool proclaims, "Dump the social cons!" Where I live social cons provide at least 95% of the Republican vote. I would guess that the percentage is lower elsewhere, but I would doubt that the Repubs could elect as much as a dog-catcher in West Podunk without the social-con vote. If the Repubs dump the social cons, it is the Republican Party, not the social cons, that will go away. As for Maxwell, think of this statement of his: "35 states have legalized gay marriage." Actually, very few states have legalized gay "marriage." In most cases it has been imposed by an imperial judiciary -- precisely because the voting power of social conservatives makes passing it through legislatures impossible.
In response to:

Fascist Fact Checkers Can Apologize Now

tgwWhale Wrote: Dec 02, 2014 3:33 PM
Crud is a commodity, but it is totally free, because it is spewed in such overwhelming amounts by progs. So the supply of Crud always exceeds demand, except by Obozo-supporters, who seem to have an insatiable appetite for Crud.
In response to:

Fascist Fact Checkers Can Apologize Now

tgwWhale Wrote: Dec 02, 2014 3:29 PM
Almost all the OPEC countries need high oil prices to keep afloat. If the Saudis keep the spigot open, it will ruin those other countries. And if Russia, Venezuela, and so forth are ruined, it will warm my heart. If we have to cap some wells for a while -- don't worry. Some day the price of oil will go up again, and we will uncap the wells and get back to drilling. Meanwhile, I will enjoy paying lower prices for gas. The Saudis will take a bath now for selling their oil cheap, and take a bath later when they try to raise the price and find they can't. And meanwhile they'll have a lot less money to fund terrorists. The Saudis LOSE, we win. Low energy prices were one of the reasons that the economy did so well in the 1990's. The Saudis and the Gulf states kept the supply up (and thus the price down) for 10 years to thank us for saving their back ends from Saddam. Low energy prices will be good for the economy today as well. So: Low oil prices mean we win, but the Russians lose, the commies in Venezuela lose, the terrorist-funders in the Middle East lose. I like that all around! DUMB PROG!
In response to:

Emanuel, Drooling Over Death

tgwWhale Wrote: Dec 01, 2014 10:18 AM
It was Nietzsche (of all people) who understood this. He proclaimed that "God is dead" and then understood that this left us "beyond good and evil." In other words, if you leave God out of the picture, there is no REAL standard of right and wrong. So Emanuel and his ilk treat human life as having value because people can produce stuff. Thus for them, people lose value when "creativity, originality, and productivity are pretty much gone." Such utilitarianism is pretty much what you're left with when you've decided that first, there is no God (or at least, no God that matters), and yet, as a socialist, you think that "we" have to pay for everyone's health care out of limit resources. It's only if you buy that old idea that "God" created all people in His image, and then "God" (the only Son, no less) died to save those people, that you can consistently come to the conclusion that all people have infinite value -- even unwanted unborns, or old people lost in dementiaville, or even Barack Hussein Obozo and Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel.
To illustrate the vile, radical EVIL of communism never gets "tired." Especially when there is a communist in the White House and communists dominate the colleges and the public school system.
It should surprise no one that the leftist idiots at Berkeley support ISIS but hate Israel. This is how the leftist reasoning goes: (1) The original rebellion of the Left is against the Judeo-Christian moral system, which is the core of Western civilization, because this moral system is self-denying -- all the "Thou shalt nots," especially regarding sexuality. If you want self-indulgence, that moral code must go. (2) When this moral code is rejected, the lefties fall back on a childish way of looking at the world, which I call "cartoon morality." In this system there is only one way of looking at things: the big guy is the bad guy, and he exploits the little guy, who is always the good guy. (The Marxist terms for "big guy" and "little guy" are "oppressor" and "oppressed.") All issues are seen through this template. (3) This is why the leftist fools always support revolutionaries, no matter how revolting they are: because they claim to be on the side of the little guy against the "oppressors." (4) And so they support ISIS and hate Israel, because Israel is rich and Western, and therefore bad -- the "big guy." Their support for ISIS and other terrorist gangs is part of their support for anyone who hates the "big guy." When you understand how leftist thought works, you understand why the lefties take such morally obscene positions such as support for ISIS.
In response to:

America, You’ve Been Grubered!

tgwWhale Wrote: Nov 24, 2014 5:19 PM
"protect THIS kind of lying crappola." Like many I wish TH would allow correcting our posts.
In response to:

America, You’ve Been Grubered!

tgwWhale Wrote: Nov 24, 2014 5:12 PM
You know, if the Obozo gang started regulating the Internet, they would protect his kind of lying crappola, and suppress all of the real posts, except for Will and Doctor Roy.
In response to:

How Democrats Defeated Themselves

tgwWhale Wrote: Nov 17, 2014 10:23 AM
The Dims played the only card they had. It was a losing card but they had no other card, because Obozo and his gang have messed up so many things so much. The Dims are dependent on getting 95% of the black vote. No matter whom they run, no matter what the issues are, they get 95% of the black vote. They could run Dracula or Frankenstein or the Thing from the Black Lagoon, and they would still get 95% of the black vote. What they need to do to win to get black people out to vote. It's all about turnout. Obozo, because he is black, got blacks to vote in higher percentages than whites voted; and along with massive fraud, this got Obozo elected twice. Since they did not have a black running for POTUS this time around, they tried to frighten blacks into voting with all of their vile, dishonest insults and threats. They failed; but it was the only card they had to play. The Dims are a racist party. They are heavily dependent on racist votes, that is, people voting based on skin color -- either their own or that of the candidate. They are currently trying to do with Hispanics what they successfully did with blacks. Their policies fail, so they fall back on racism. It has worked for them since the 60's. This time, it didn't work. But as I said, it was the only card they had to play.
In response to:

The American Public Gets Smart

tgwWhale Wrote: Nov 13, 2014 1:07 PM
People who were stupid enough t support Obamacare lies are probably stupid enough to believe your spam lies. You won't find them here on TH. Go to Huffpo, and maybe you'll find some brain-dead suckers over there. And because of course no one reads replies to spam posts: Flagged, of course, for spam.
Previous 11 - 20 Next