In response to:

Report: Obama Was Briefed on Benghazi Terrorism Connection Days Before Susan Rice's Public Denials

Tever Wrote: Nov 19, 2012 3:37 PM
Why is everyone, including the "conservative press", ignoring Broadwell's assertion that militants were being held there, and also that the embassy was being used as a conduit for arms being supplied by our government to Al Quida operatives with the express purpose of overthrowing the Syrian government. That is the crux of this whole insane episode, the smoking gun so to speak of the Obama's administration treasonous and impeachable offenses. It is so much bigger than a simple politically CYA lying episode. If we allow them to frame this as a simple misrepresentation to protect national security as it seems they are trying to do, we have lost the argument completely. Why is Ms Broadwell not on the stand right along with her John, Patraeus?

Just last week, the president adamantly defended his Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, who is widely rumored to be a leading contender to replace Hillary Clinton at State.  Rice appeared on all five Sunday morning shows on September 16, five days after the deadly 9/11 attacks.  She advanced three core assertions for public consumption:

(1) The the violence had spilled over from "spontaneous" protests over an internet video.  (There were no protests outside of the Benghazi consulate leading up to the...