1 - 3
In response to:

Alec Baldwin vs. Liberal Bullies

tdixon Wrote: Nov 21, 2013 10:00 AM
She's also using the support of Baldwin as a creative hook to draw the reader into the core objective of the article: to condemn the hypocrisy of the left. She's suggesting that conservatives should model reasonableness in casting judgement. While it is reasonable to conclude that his comments were hatefully hostile, it's wholly irrational to suggest that he is anti-gay simply because his string of cuss words included "f@g". A short review of his life provides plenty of evidence to soundly defeat the suggestion that he's anti-gay. She is simply saying that slanderously labeling people by exaggerating isolated facts is a leftist tactic that the right should be above.
You suggest that conservatives aren't rational....then write this? Statistically speaking, the facts are the opposite of what you state. Homeschool students have a higher success rate in college and employment. For the sacrificing parent able and willing to give their child the unique and self-evidently beneficial blessing of a homeschooled education....it's a quite rational decision to do so.
Agreed. To be "socially liberal but fiscally conservative" is like being frivolously frugal. Lets spend money we don't have on things we can't afford to make ourselves feel good....but make sure we use a low interest rate credit card when we do.
1 - 3