In response to:

Doing the Research the New York Times Won't Do

tdevlin Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 12:04 PM
I wish our country of 300,000,000 people would quit be compared to much smaller ones. The reason for more violent crimes lays at Obama's feet and the ginning up of the coveting anger he has perpetuated daily from his podium about class warfare. Teach respect for one another in your speeches and just maybe you will better results. Mr. Obama, you preach fear and loathing not respect and unity.
Elizabeth420 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 12:11 PM
tdevilin: Obama is promoting class warfare & divisiveness & does so with little regard for the long
term consequences or repercussions.
sparcboy Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 12:28 PM
Quite to the contrary, Obama does so with total regards to the long term consequences and repercussions. That is why he is doing it.
Polly1 Wrote: Jan 10, 2013 12:30 PM
Actually it's possible that the long term consequences and repercussions fit into Obama's plans perfectly.

(See, e.g., Cloward-Piven Strategy.)

In Sunday's New York Times, Elisabeth Rosenthal claimed, as the title of her article put it, "More Guns = More Killing." She based this on evidence that would never be permitted in any other context at the Times: (1) anecdotal observations; and (2) bald assertions of an activist, blandly repeated with absolutely no independent fact-checking by the Times.

There is an academic, peer-reviewed, long-term study of the effect of various public policies on public, multiple shootings in all 50 states over a 20-year period performed by renowned economists at the University of Chicago and Yale, William Landes and John...