Many true conservatives saw the danger in the Patriot Act and how it would lead to more and more rights being stripped but I didn't think it would come so fast. I wish people would stop paying blind allegiance to the parties and see (R) and (D) on a national level means nothing.

I'll call them no people flying thingies, that still doesn't mean I want them flying over our skies blowing people up without due process.

We should have tanks. The 2nd Amendment states we need a well regulated Militia, which I believe would be able to combat a militaristic force. There should be organization throughout communities specifically to counter various threats posed. The problem is as soon as people start to organize they are labeled domestic terrorist or extremest. The term "militia" is also though of negatively in itself. States have the National Guards, but there's too much tied into the federal government for them to be counted on.

Leon Panther huh and if you watch the last second of the video I do believe we may be attacked from Siberia.

"You people" is racist, didn't you get the memo?

"You people" is racist, didn't you get the memo?

Go learn the violent crime rates of Europe and stop playing word games, then come back with a logical argument. Of course countries where there is few guns will have fewer "gun" crimes. U.K. has a higher violent crime rate than U.S, which in fact is lowering every year while gun ownership rises.

One of the most prolific mass shootings in our recent time happened in Norway where gun laws are extremely strict. All the mass shootings jumped on by the media in the past decade or two wouldn't add up to the body count. I wish we could have a crystal ball to show those who hate firearms so much how many lives were saved by guns and the possible mass shootings that never happened.

The Department of Justice Crime Victimization Survey reports for every crime a gun is used against another six are used to defend against a crime. If all those were worst case scenario, your one life saved would cost six lives in return. So if you are truly "pro-life" you would support ones ability to defend themselves. Speaking of wanting to save lives, there are numerous other tools used in killing people and I see no uproar on that. Vehicles cause more deaths than any other instrument but no one is banning them. Why not, because cars are more useful and we need them? We don't need cars, so if you really want to save lives let's ban cars, alcohol, fast food, cigarettes. No? I didn't think so because that would inconvenience us.