In response to:

Violence Breaks Out in Michigan Against Conservatives as Union Protests Rage

TaxFree1031 Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:30 PM
Nobody took away their right to belong to a union. Why all the fuss?
RufusTFirefly Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:39 PM
Read up on the effect of this. It is designed to break unions by making them pay for 'free riders'.
Joseph64 Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:50 PM
EVERYONE is going to be a free rider. if given the choice between paying thousands a year to the union or taking that money home to their families, how many do you realistically believe will keep giving that money to the union?
Jay Wye Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:50 PM
WGS; "free riders" cost the unions nothing. Union activity would go on regardless.
olddoc4444 Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:54 PM
Dumbazz, the law that says they must bargain for everyone is there to protect union members, not non union people. If companies had the option, do you really think they would ever deal with corpulent, unproductive, rabble rousing thugs? No, they would prefer to deal with those without any proclivities toward unionization.
Achturrian Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 2:06 PM
More BS from the local troll aintnotn
Bear Trax Wrote: Dec 11, 2012 1:36 PM
Their right to force people to pay tribute to union bosses to oppose their employer (source of their livlihood) has been reduced. From now on, the unions have to begin providing benefits to their members, not just democrats, who the workers may oppose.

The Republican controlled Michigan legislature passed right-to-work legislation late Tuesday morning as union members loudly protested inside and outside of the Capitol in Lansing. Michigan Democrat Rep. Douglas Geiss threatened on the House floor this morning "there would be blood" if the legislation passed. Riot police have been on the scene since early this morning bracing for violence.

The Michigan House Democrats reiterated their threat on their Twitter page, but have since deleted it.

Photobucket