In light of the revelation that Mitt Romney was "shell-shocked" by his loss last week, I've been pretty tough on the job performance of his campaign's internal pollsters, who clearly missed the mark -- resulting in costly tactical decisions down the stretch:
These analyses [of the "expand the map" strategy] make sense, but only within the context of the campaign truly believing that they were safe in other crucial must-have states -- a cataclysmically wrong assumption. When I stopped by Romney headquarters in Boston back in September, Newhouse said his team was anticipating a...











He had so much in his profile that moderates, even Dems would go for,
But he was a very-mediocre-uninspiring campaigner !
Since M-R didn't win, in hindsight Ron Paul could've won because he would've been able to co-opt alot of Obama's issues.
R-P was against the M-E-wars, WDC-Wall-St-Collusion-Corruption, for Auditing-the-FED, bringing-back-Glass-Steagall, all-from-way-back !
Lol, even OWS-types would've ditched the Obamination, campaigned for R-P, with that kind of anti-WDC-Wall-St-Collusion-Corruption, Audit-the-FED, political-platform !
He's pro-Life, but wouldn't have been defined as such though, women would've flocked to him because he's a womens Dr !
What does religion have to do with righteousness? If you are talking about Christianity, I can tell you that one cannot be a Democrat and a Christian. One can be a religious nonChristian and a Democrat. That's a no brainer since all religions are false. Christianity it truth.
If moderates didn't like extremists, they would dislike Obama. So it isn't about extremism. The only reason a woman would see Ryan as a threat is because she is stupid.