In response to:

Ending Gun Violence Requires Commitment, Not All of it Voluntary

talltexanoilfieldtrash Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 12:38 PM
I wonder, did the 0 startle a bunch of folks into buying new guns, recently, so when he declares martial law, he knows where to send large bunches of his 'brown shirts' to get their guns and protect his tail? HMMM.....
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 7:21 PM
the only way they can do that is to seize all the Form 4473's from the gun dealers.(like in Red Dawn)

any decent FFL should be ready to have an "accidental fire" that destroys his 4473s,once a seizure law is enacted.
Truckman Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 3:42 PM
And,does he really think having an "army" of several hundred thousand "brown-shirts" to confiscate guns will be any match for over 100 million gun owners who know,and believe in the primary we HAVE the Second Amendment?
Truckman Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 3:42 PM
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 24, 2013 7:22 PM
Pick the PROPER targets;
the ones to shoot are the US legislators who ratified such a law,the putz who SIGNED the law,the judges who upheld it.

if you wait until they are at your door,it's already too late. They WILL bring overwhelming force to bear on individuals and small groups. You'll end up like the Branch Davidians at Waco.

the time to act is right after the oppressive laws are enacted.

The good news is: Obama and the Senate Democrats have no intention of passing more idiotic gun legislation in response to the Newtown massacre. The bad news is that they also have no intention of passing any legislation about the mentally ill, which would actually do something to reduce these mass shootings.

Instead, the Democrats will jawbone about "assault weapons" and other meaningless gun laws for the sole purpose of scaring soccer moms into hating the National Rifle Association. Expect to hear a lot about Republicans preferring "the gun lobby" to "children." (Which is evidently not at all like...