In response to:

More Settled Science: Wrong about Ice Melt in Greenland, Sea-Rise

suyts Wrote: Nov 30, 2012 11:10 AM
@ M. Hillinger. In regards to other sources of ice and melt please read these two links. Links to science studies are provided within. http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/yes-yes-they-really-are-that-dumb/ This covers the recently known non-melt in the Himalayas. Then read this.... http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/is-climate-central-intentionally-misleading-their-readers-or-are-they-simply-not-up-to-date-on-their-information/ NASA says the cumulative ice budget for the Antarctic is growing at 49 Gt/yr. Question. Is it that you are not up to date with the current science, or are you intentionally misleading people?

New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences tends to now show that ice melt estimates previously calculated for Greenland have not significantly accelerated- as has been previously postulated- nor has the melt contributed in a meaningful way to the rise of sea levels.

Recently, much of the destruction on the east coast as a consequence of Super-Mega-Hurricane Sandy Gore was blamed on the rise in sea-levels, which have been blamed on…drum roll…global warming.

The newest revelation, amongst many in the last several years that have muffled the global warming chants of  “settled science, settled...