In response to:

More Settled Science: Wrong about Ice Melt in Greenland, Sea-Rise

suyts Wrote: Nov 30, 2012 10:57 AM
If you're going to take that position then you need to calculate the costs of your caution. You also need to distinguish the difference between being a good steward and atmospheric CO2. There's nothing inherently bad about CO2. It's is a requirement for life. Poverty, which is the end result of your "caution" will create much more ecological harm than prosperity. Pull your head out.

New research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences tends to now show that ice melt estimates previously calculated for Greenland have not significantly accelerated- as has been previously postulated- nor has the melt contributed in a meaningful way to the rise of sea levels.

Recently, much of the destruction on the east coast as a consequence of Super-Mega-Hurricane Sandy Gore was blamed on the rise in sea-levels, which have been blamed on…drum roll…global warming.

The newest revelation, amongst many in the last several years that have muffled the global warming chants of  “settled science, settled...