Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

suyts Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:28 AM
Fascinating, aintnothing invents a statistic and then claims others a owned by their ideology. Ain't, I've read many exclaiming an overwhelming consensus, upon inspection we see the claims don't stand up to the light of truth, but in all of them, I've never seen a 99% claim. You are truly owned by your ideology.
In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

suyts Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:21 AM
Eric, this is the trap set which you've just walked into. You're conflating environmental damage with the Carbon dioxide issue. They're not remotely related. No one is against energy efficiency. Try applying some economics to the fuel efficient cars. It's all great and good, but entirely meaningless to the CAGW issue. You don't have to be a scientist to understand a few mpg increases will do nothing toward the global atmospheric CO2 levels. The economic hole we've dug, is in part, because of the CAGW idiocy. We're paying higher prices for energy and fuel...... what does that do to an economy? Apply a cost/benefit analysis to any CAGW inspired project and you'll see it isn't worth it.
Read what he wrote in it's entirety. "But then I explore some implications. If you believe in a system based on property rights and private contracts, then right-to-work laws are an unjust form of intervention." But, the right to work is the default position. Forcing one to be part of a union by implementation of a law is the intrusion into the relationship between employer and employee.
Are you intentionally confusing the teachings of Christ or are you simply confused? Sharia law? Jesus? How is it that you're not familiar with the teachings but seem to profess your own authority in knowledge? 8:4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. 8:5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? 8:6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. 8:7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. You should be familiar with the rest.
He's so nutty he's confused. The embassy is in Tripoli. The consulate, was the "consulate" when the Ambassador is there conducting embassy business. The CIA operation was in an entirely different compound, physically over a mile away from the embassy. Fox news reported on the gun procurement operation weeks before any of the LSM reported on it. Such as it is with leftists. Facts don't matter when you live in a delusional world.
So, resisting animal instinct to copulate with whomever and where ever is placing instinct over intellect? You've got that backwards, idiot. Violent rejection? Mitchel was talking about the "right-to-work" law in Michigan. Given the actions of the unions there, I'm surprised you brought up the issue of violence. Labelling any kettles, lately? Fact is, if you want to measure violence by demographics, we see the areas in this country where the left is prevalent, so too is violence. Much more than in areas dominated by Republicans.
You entirely failed to understand the teaching of Christ, and it wasn't remotely relevant to Mitchel's post. Try finding some meaning here..... Matthew 20:1–16 I mean, if you're going to misconstrue, one just as well start there. Next, you should make an effort to understand the difference between social conservatism and economic conservatism. Conflating the two doesn't say much towards the depth of your contributions.
Dan, you got it backwards. It was government interference that created the totalitarian laws mandating union membership to being with. The right to work law simply removed the prior governmental interference.
@ M. Hillinger. In regards to other sources of ice and melt please read these two links. Links to science studies are provided within. http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/yes-yes-they-really-are-that-dumb/ This covers the recently known non-melt in the Himalayas. Then read this.... http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/09/24/is-climate-central-intentionally-misleading-their-readers-or-are-they-simply-not-up-to-date-on-their-information/ NASA says the cumulative ice budget for the Antarctic is growing at 49 Gt/yr. Question. Is it that you are not up to date with the current science, or are you intentionally misleading people?
Stuart, do you believe the waters in the ocean remain there? Or does something magical and strange like evaporation occurs, and then clouds form and move over land and then rains?
Upwith. Do you somehow think what happened in Galveston is tied to the current Climate Change issue? Do you realize you just made an argument to ignore the hyperbolic prognostications of the lunatics?
Previous 21 - 30 Next