John, you think that's bad, here's what an IPCC author had to say "There is wide scientific consensus that the increased number and intensity of climate change induced natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcano eruptions, tsunamis and hurricanes, is of alarming concern." http://suyts.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/that-super-sciency-ipcc-strikes-again/

John, you think that's bad, here's what an IPCC author had to say "There is wide scientific consensus that the increased number and intensity of climate change induced natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcano eruptions, tsunamis and hurricanes, is of alarming concern." http://suyts.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/that-super-sciency-ipcc-strikes-again/

Amen Brother! Amen

LMAO, goshdarn Libtard doesn't understand that a snow storm is weather, not climate. :)

Chicaree, quit believing everything you read. Farmers are fine. They pray for rain when it's dry and curse the rain when it's wet. This has been going on for centuries. 2012 wasn't the warmest year ever. The US isn't the globe. ID10t. Globally, it was one of the coolest this century. And, there is no increase in extreme weather events. There's an increase in news coverage. Crops aren't failing from heat and drought any more than they always have.

Yeh, John it's fascinating, even before Nemo hit we saw the nutters lining up to explain how snowing in the NorthEast during winter is caused by global warming. The nutjobbery is becoming hilariously desperate. Now, weather, any weather, even snow in the winter, is proof positive of climate change. One wouldn't think that we'd have to point out that it has, in fact, snowed in the winter prior to our industrialization and that it has continued to snow in the winters, seems like every year!?!?! And even then you'll be called a denier! For those clinging to this idiotic notion, and that global warming has caused an increase in precipitation in the US, http://suyts.wordpress.com/2013/02/08/more-of-the-moreless-cagw-proofs/

Uhmm, no, that's not what Ransom is doing. What he's saying is that weather is weather and that's not climate. Or, did you bother to read the article?

He was never a skeptic. He only called himself one after he started the BEST project. Muller is a showman, and certainly not an expert on the subject. http://suyts.wordpress.com/2012/07/29/muller-never-was-a-skeptic/

Maybe not, but they did grow barely. How's their barley crop today?

LOL!!! Eric, have you looked at the paper? The dolt actually believes he knows what the temps were in 1753 by looking at 10 thermometers all in Europe or North America. http://suyts.wordpress.com/2013/01/20/does-coloring-large-error-estimates-make-the-paper-any-more-valid-best-published/ It's less than sophistry.