In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

suyts Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:21 AM
Eric, this is the trap set which you've just walked into. You're conflating environmental damage with the Carbon dioxide issue. They're not remotely related. No one is against energy efficiency. Try applying some economics to the fuel efficient cars. It's all great and good, but entirely meaningless to the CAGW issue. You don't have to be a scientist to understand a few mpg increases will do nothing toward the global atmospheric CO2 levels. The economic hole we've dug, is in part, because of the CAGW idiocy. We're paying higher prices for energy and fuel...... what does that do to an economy? Apply a cost/benefit analysis to any CAGW inspired project and you'll see it isn't worth it.

A prominent global warming scientist, Peter Gleick, who was chairman of the ethics committee at the American Geophysical Union, admitted last year that he stole some documents- and he may have forged others- from the conservative think-tank the Heartland Institute. But that’s all in a day’s work for a work-a-day climate warrior. The important thing isn’t the quest for the truth in global climate research, but, as Charlie Sheen would say, winning. With winning comes cash.   

Because for some time it’s been clear, that in the climate debate, instead of actually accomplishing something worthwhile, all the attention will be...

Related Tags: Climate Change