In response to:

The New Rules for Radicals

Sutter Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 12:45 PM
Conservative ideology is the problem. How can you change and alter a fundamentally flawed political, social, and economic ideology? Keep guessing Republipukes. Keep guessing...
1375 Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 2:10 PM
Anominus Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 12:55 PM
Stutter, a happy pig will never leave its sty. So long as the government fills your bucket of slop, what could ever bring you away from your "fundamentally flawed political, social, and economic ideology?"
NW-Res Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 12:55 PM
This "fundamentally flawed political, social, and economic ideology" produced the greatest standard of living for all level of society, ever.

But you liberals think the sane thing to do is change it.
GodsLaws Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 12:50 PM
The interesting point you (unintentionally) make is that, like most leftist ghouls, you actually BELIEVE that claiming something to be true MAKES it true.

You are free to reinterpret reality all you want. Just don't expect the rest of us to support your delusion.

TunTavern Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 2:54 PM
Sweetie, your side believes that there's a mythical being up in the sky orchestrating everything here on earth.
Your side tends to believe in a book that includes talking snakes, men rising from the dead, and a guy losing his superhuman strength due to a haircut...
And yet YOU talk about delusion!?
Anominus Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 3:10 PM
@TT: Your side believes in the mythical goodwill of government - I find that far more delusional than all the oddities of all the religions existing on Earth.

It is a proven, documented fact that governments kill citizens - I can't say the same thing about any spiritual being / deity - yet you worship government, nonetheless!
Carl469 Wrote: Feb 02, 2013 12:42 AM
You have unwittingly summarized everything that's wrong with religious radicals.
Quintus_T_Cicero Wrote: Jan 31, 2013 12:50 PM
Sutter:

Can you name one program that libs love that has done what it was advertized to do, at the cost advertized, and has not been over-regulated, and over-bureaucratized?

 

Here’s a list of rules for the GOP to consider if it wants to win another presidency in the 21st century, according to S.E. Cupp.

-------------------

Excerpted from Townhall Magazine's February Closing Argument installment by S.E. Cupp (note: Excerpts of this column ran in the New York Daily News on Dec. 12,
2012
):

Republicans still reeling from the November elections and fiscal cliff negotiations that left them with a bruising 43:1 ratio of revenue...

Related Tags: Townhall Magazine