We might actually become the Golden State again. But please don't bad-mouth San Diegans -- we vote conservative in every election, but are held hostage by the dimwits in LA and SF.

Robert Jeffress, the pastor who called Mormonism a "cult", has said that 30 million evangelicals stayed home in 2008 and did not vote -- Barack Obama won by 10 million votes. Makes one wonder: are evangelicals going to protest (sulk) by staying home again this year and give Obama another term? I hope this group is a whole lot smarter this time around because traditional American values and freedoms are at stake.

Perfect, Mitt -- hit 'em hard every single day with statistics and sources; it's not enough to say Obama has failed, it has to be backed up with facts and this is a great start.

blah blah blah; parroting WH talking points blah blah blah

Straight Republican ticket, including Romney; this election will not be a time for a protest vote or a time to stay home and sulk because your candidate didn't win the nomination. Obama needs to be defeated resoundingly; he must go. The democrats and media have shamelessly exploited the idea of the "first black President" while the first black president has shamelessly exploited the power-lusting democrats and media -- people too dumb to realize they will also lose.

Santorum is really turning out to be a little sick in the head; his lust for the presidency is evidently sending him over the edge as he sees it slipping away. I like Romney because he doesn't just want to be President, he wants to fix the government -- that's what he does best, turning deficits into surpluses, reorganizing, reworking, retooling; he's an economic efficiency expert. Take an Etch-A-Sketch to the Obama Administration: erase it and start with a clean slate.

Newt and Santorum must have seen the polls that said not all of Newt's supporters would automatically vote for Santorum, so Romney will win no matter what the Laurel and Hardy duo concoct behind the scenes.

If Santorum is the nominee, which I don't think he will be, and beats Obama, which I don't think he has a chance of doing, it will be replacing a socialist ideologue with a religious ideologue. As a Christian believer, I dislike the socialist anti-religion ideology but don't believe we should be electing a religious ideologue either. We need to elect a Chief Executive: someone with executive and economic experience. Puerto Ricans got it right.

Romney is critized by Evangelicals as being of a "different" religion -- Mormons are Christians, just a different sect; Catholics are a different sect of Christianity, they have the Pope; Protestants are a different sect, no frills; all believe in Jesus Christ as Savior, so I don't get this different religion mindset. And if Evangelicals think Mormons are a "cult", a lot of people think Evangelicals are a "cult" as well. One pastor said on TV that he always considered the Mormons to be on our side -- I do too. After all, it's far more risky to leave the country in the hands of Barack Obama, whose religious beliefs are a tad cloudy, and his downright radical crowd.

So when Romney gets the nomination, social conservatives and libertarians will throw a hissy-fit and give Obama another 4 years just for spite -- very intelligent. I am a strong fiscal conservative for Romney, the guy with actual qualifications and expertise for the chief executive position. I would certainly vote for a social conservative or libertarian if you had one who could beat Obama, but you don't.