In response to:

Feinstein: Yeah, We Still Need to Talk to Petraeus About Benghazi

Summers Wrote: Nov 12, 2012 10:39 PM
Petraeus couldn't or wouldn't keep his pants on. To make matters worse, he is going with some psycho who is threatening another woman and giving speeches with more information than she should have had in them. Today a military brass friend of Petraeus' (like he has a lot) shows up to keep saying the affair didn't begin while Petraeus was in the military but the woman was with him in Afghanistan for a year. Is there a contest going on to show how stupid these wedgeheads think the American people are? I'm on to them. I caught on to them so long ago that just the mention of their names give me the dry heaves.

Just because he had an affair, General David Petraeus isn't getting out of his congressional testimony duties. Tonight on MSNBC, Chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee Diane Feinstein told Andrea Mitchell that Petraeus still needs to testify about the 9/11 attack in Benghazi, despite recent revalations about an extramarital affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell.

"I have no doubt now that we will need to talk with David Petraeus and we will likely do that in closed session. But it will be done one way or another."