In response to:

Rick Santorum Was Right About Incest and the Slippery Slope

SubplotTruth Wrote: Sep 14, 2012 4:23 PM
They don't know what it means, Bill1895. That's just the point. It sound bad, so they have to bully people with it. The 2 things they are good at: Bullying/control, and changing definitions. For the debate, here IS the definition (which equally applies to sodomites): "A person who is obstinately and unreasonably wedded to a particular religious creed, opinion, practice or ritual. The word is sometimes used in an enlarged sense, for a person who is illiberally attached to any opinion, or system of belief; as a bigot to the Mohammedan religion; a bigot to a form of government." For the record, I am not "homophobic" For 1) I am not afraid of them, just their agenda, which is a JUSTIFIABLE fear.
In April 2003, Senator Rick Santorum stated that, “If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything.” For this he was mocked and vilified. It turns out he was right.

In my last article, “Here Comes Incest, Just as Predicted,” I pointed to a small but growing societal trend towards the acceptance of consensual, adult incest, especially when...