There is a strong argument here for a voting system based on issues and not personalities (or race). Imagine a ballot that contained a series of questions about the voter's position on say a couple of dozen community or national issues instead of candidates' names. First the voter would have to be literate and know something about the issues. That would eliminate many of these folk from influencing the election results by stupidly block voting and prevent politicians from running personality campaigns (HIllary, for one). The candidate who most closely aligned with the majority positions would be elected and that person would have an unambiguous mandate from the electorate during his term. The caveat here is that the questions would have to be neutrally worded, and I wouldn't count on that happening.
- CPAC Panel: How conservatives win in 2016 Ed Morrissey 1 hour ago
- Open thread: Sunday morning talking heads Allahpundit 2 hours ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 14 hours ago
- Carly Fiorina on Putin, Russia and the new cold war Jazz Shaw 15 hours ago
- CPAC straw poll winner: Rand Paul Ed Morrissey 16 hours ago
- Why we can’t have nice things: Peter King edition Jazz Shaw 17 hours ago