There is a strong argument here for a voting system based on issues and not personalities (or race). Imagine a ballot that contained a series of questions about the voter's position on say a couple of dozen community or national issues instead of candidates' names. First the voter would have to be literate and know something about the issues. That would eliminate many of these folk from influencing the election results by stupidly block voting and prevent politicians from running personality campaigns (HIllary, for one). The candidate who most closely aligned with the majority positions would be elected and that person would have an unambiguous mandate from the electorate during his term. The caveat here is that the questions would have to be neutrally worded, and I wouldn't count on that happening.
- Variety: Obama threw gasoline on the Sony fire Ed Morrissey 41 mins ago
- Al Sharpton very worried that execution of police officers will derail his movement Jazz Shaw 2 hours ago
- Quotes of the day Allahpundit 14 hours ago
- Likely 2016 GOP nominee wants Joanne Chesimard returned from Cuba first thing Jazz Shaw 15 hours ago
- Rahm Emanuel’s son mugged outside of Chicago home Jazz Shaw 17 hours ago
- Will Dems who blamed Palin for Giffords attack refuse a ‘conversation’ about NYC shootings? Noah Rothman 18 hours ago