In response to:

The Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Work Then and It Won’t Work Now

strebor Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 9:30 AM
Get a grip. This not about crime or safety or is about "gun control". Gun control = disarmed civilians. When these quislings refer to how successful "gun control" is in UK, Oz or Canada.....they mean the success of "guncontrol" which has nothing to do with crime, safety, or children. Therefore gun control in Switzerland is unsuccessful. t'aint right, tain't wrong, just is
Tea Party in Wisconsin formerlyTea Party Wrote: Dec 30, 2012 10:05 AM
In Britain is you have not turned over your gun to your overlords, and if you have a home invasion with the perps threatening your life and you shoot them..they don't get jail time, YOU DO. I forget the name of the guy who did just that and is now in prison while the hoods were celebrated. Dance with the devil and this is what you get. Britain turned away from the GOD of their fathers decades ago and now this is the price..preferred treatment of muslims over ethnic Brits and preferred rights to both muslims and hoods. I am so thankful my grandparents on both sides came to the U S in the earlier years of the 20th century.

Senator Dianne Feinstein is queuing up come January 2013 to retable—yet again—an Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) in order to “severely mitigate the possibilities of another Sandy Hook atrocity.” Great idea, Dianne, as the first AWB that Clinton signed into law worked wonders in schools from 1994-2004. It was awesome. It panned out wonderfully aside from the following:

  • November 7, 1994: Wickliffe, Ohio: (Wickliffe Middle School shooting) Keith Ledeger, 37, a former student at the school, shot and killed custodian Pete Christopher and wounded four other adults.
  • January 12, 1995: Seattle, Washington: A...