Let us have a healthy debate on global warming and move beyond the personal attacks to address the substance of the issue, is global warming taking place, does human activity contribute to the process, and what can we do about it?
A prominent global warming scientist, Peter Gleick, who was chairman of the ethics committee at the American Geophysical Union, admitted last year that he stole some documents- and he may have forged others- from the conservative think-tank the Heartland Institute. But that’s all in a day’s work for a work-a-day climate warrior. The important thing isn’t the quest for the truth in global climate research, but, as Charlie Sheen would say, winning. With winning comes cash.
Because for some time it’s been clear, that in the climate debate, instead of actually accomplishing something worthwhile, all the attention will be...
At various times at Townhall, I've tried to engage the so-called "consensus science" people on the science, but, they don't seem to know any of it. They just pop over here and say 99% of something say something without looking at what they're really saying.
You might try http://climateclash.com/climate-sceptics-and-scientists-attempt-peace-deal/#more-731
Climateclash was to be a learned debate between august representatives of both sides, but it fell apart when the pro-AGW expert staunchly refused to use real SCIENTIFIC PRINCIPLES.