In response to:

Arming Ourselves Against Barbarians

Steve of CA Wrote: Jul 19, 2012 4:02 PM
"And aren’t the members of the IOC and GCTF closer in outlook to them than to people like Chertoff and me — people who believe that terrorists, their funders, and their supporters must be confronted and crushed, not appeased and accommodated?" Would killing Osama Bin Laden and his associates qualify?
Trude3 Wrote: Jul 20, 2012 1:31 PM
I am bothered by this memory: Around December 06 a Navy Seal came home from Afghanistan
He told his family that they had had bin Laden in their laser sights and phoned the Pentagon
for permission to take him out. The reply was to leave him alone.
Unless Navy Seals lie, my thoughts were 'what are they saving him (OBL) for' ?
annfan_777 Wrote: Jul 19, 2012 9:46 PM
Yes, but all the credit goes to Bush, not Obama.

Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, I expected there would soon be consensus across ideological, national, and other lines that terrorism is wrong — that no political goal or grievance justifies intentionally murdering innocent men, women, and children. I was wrong.

Last week, Pew released the results of a poll that found that Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, is viewed favorably by 76 percent of the population of Pakistan, ostensibly one of America’s closest allies among nations self-identifying as Islamic. Iran also is viewed favorably by 39 percent of Tunisians, generally regarded as among the most moderate...

Sunday, May 19 | 04:06 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 04:06 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 04:06 PM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 04:06 PM ET