Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

The Art of the Impossible

Steven F Wrote: Apr 30, 2013 6:07 PM
I thought is was 10 miles square, which would be 100 square miles. That said, I agree with the sentiment.
In response to:

A Post-Post Office World

Steven F Wrote: Apr 17, 2013 7:45 PM
But it's not. The Constitution says, "Congress shall have the Power To ... establish Post Offices." But it doesn't have to use that power. I'm glad to see someone else say this. I have been making the same statement in comments to articles about the post office every chance I get.
I believe atheists are wrong, but they are not all morons. The only actual atheist I have ever actually heard discuss the subject is Penn Gillette. I don't accept his conclusions, but he is anything but a moron.
The LAST thing they need is sensitivity training. The ENTIRE purpose of such training is to CREATE intolerance.
Don't waste time replying to spam. We all know its spam. Just click 'Flag as Offensive' and ignore.
Ask the reverse question. If it is only 3.9% of all gun sales, why are the ANTI-gun people working so hard to pass it? Answer, the bill has NOTHING to do with what they claim. The so called loophole is a FLAT OUT LIE used to hide the actual intent of the bill.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Steven F Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 6:23 PM
I disagree on on point. There is ONE way to win a war. Rendering the enemy INCAPABLE of continuing. Wearing them down only temporarily ends active combat, it is NOT a victory.
In response to:

'Proportional' Response

Steven F Wrote: Apr 09, 2013 6:20 PM
Back before the clever new notion of "proportional" response became the vogue, our response to Pearl Harbor was ultimately Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That sounds proportional to me. You kill 1of us and we turn 1 million of you to glass is a proportion EVERYONE understands.
Don't waste time telling us the obvious. Just flag and ignore.
That number had no validity either. The CORRECT statement was that 90$ of guns the Mexican government ASKED the ATF to trace originated in the US. They didn't bother asking unless they had reason to believe they originated in the US. In short, the ACTUAL meaning of the statistic is that 10% of the guns the Mexican government THOUGHT come from the US did not. Note: The 40% number came from a SURVEY of gun owners, not from records of sales.
Why should she be able to. Like all political weapons, the term doesn't HAVE a definition.
Previous 11 - 20 Next