Where do we even find all these pedophiles to appoint as judges?

You should read the article before commenting.

The article was about Obama's shameless contempt for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the very nature of the republic.

Nothing to get excited about. The correct term is "foreign invader" anyway.

Nothing that Bill Clinton "achieved" was his fault. The Republican Congress forced him to do those things against his will during his second term. George Bush, after that best and brightest moment you mention, decided to conquer Iraq, which his father wisely had declined to do. Predictably, he ended up with a long, protracted, expensive, and mostly successful war on his hands, but he had to bow to Democrat demands to see it through. Yes, barack took over a listing ship, but his remedy was, and continues to be, to level the deck using plates cut from the hull. All of the Democrats in Congress, and most of the Republicans, are gleefully wielding cutting torches. We all need to hope that the water is not very deep in our part of the ocean.

I don't understand Mr. Elder's attitude. If Carrey were an idiot, his ignorance could be excused by his genetically imposed inability to learn. He would be in need of our tolerance and support. If he were young, he could be forgiven his inexperience, and we could offer instruction. If, however, Jim Carrey is possessed of anything approaching normal intelligence, he is 51 years old, and has no excuse for his abysmal ignorance. He has had ample opportunity, and plenty of time, to learn. Instead, he has carefully cultivated and nurtured a mind devoid of facts and divorced from reality. He deserves nothing but contempt.

To the rest of the world, what we wear does, in fact, define who we are. That is why it is important to dress in a manner that expresses who we are, not who someone else thinks they would like us to be.

This is precisely the reason why the Federal government was established as a republic, and not as a democracy. The theory was that people would elect thoughtful, responsible representatives who could be depended upon to legislate in the best interests of the republic. The founders knew the system would collapse as soon as the people realized that they could elect representatives who are willing to trade the good of the republic for votes, but it was, and is, the best they could do.

Both, actually. The Second declares the specific right to keep and bear arms in a responsible manner. (Meaning, don't use it for crimes.) The Fourth protects them from seizure because they are part of a person's "effects."

Actually, it worked out pretty well until we collectively decided that morality and virtue were useless relics of a dead past, reserved for old retirees and losers.

"The FAA prohibits deploying weapons on civil aircraft." So what? The Constitution forbids the existence of the FAA, but there they are.