In response to:

Philadelphia Came out in Astronomical Numbers for Obama

Steve31 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:05 PM
SO the democrats were for letting a despot who murdered 200000 of his own people who funded terrorists Invaded Kuwait. and had nuclear aspirations go unchallenged? There is no morality in this libs and no religion ,other than soak the rich weaken the military and leave the borders open. There are many people with alot of power standing by if the excesses of the libs start endangering the existence of the country . These people ave money and power and will have the backing of the military (which hated Obama) if need be. I would tread lightly if I were the Dems.
jbrantley Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:22 PM
So the Republicans are for the exact same thing in NK? Why havent they done anything about that? No oil have something to do with it? Actually, almost my entire platoon was Obama supporters. Officers are the ones who tend toward conservatism, not enlisted men. We had a little celebration when he got elected during my Iraq deployment in '08. What does that say about Bush/Us if Saddam ran that country better than we could? Have you been to Iraq lately? Life is no better now than it was under Saddam, and it some places its quite worse. Educate yourself:

In Philadelphia President Obama won the city with 85% of the vote, but in 13 precincts he won 99% or more. This vote is mostly due to the large African American populations in these wards. Obama carried these same ones in 2008.

Even though many voters were not as enthusiastic to vote this year, these wards in Philadelphia managed to be just as excited to vote for Obama.

"In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working...