In response to:

Nate Silver's Numbers Racket

Steve 21 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 10:24 AM
Goldberg, you are way off (as usual). Nate Silver's numbers were, once again, unbelievably accurate. Stop believing all the phony numbers Karl Rove puts out and go with someone who knows what he is doing.

In the last week or so, an intense kerfuffle broke out over the poll-prognosticator Nate Silver and his blog at the New York Times, FiveThirtyEight. Silver, a statistician, has been predicting a decisive Obama victory for a very long time, based on his very complicated statistical model, which very, very few of his fans or detractors understand.

On any given day, Silver might have announced that -- given the new polling data -- "the model" was now finding that the president had an 86.3 percent chance of winning. Not 86.4 percent, you fools. Not 86.1 percent, you Philistines. But 86.3 percent,...

Wednesday, June 19 | 08:25 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:25 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:25 PM ET
Wednesday, June 19 | 08:25 PM ET