In response to:

Expect Civil Disobedience if Politicians Try to Undermine the Second Amendment

stereotypo Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 8:30 AM
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. If I understand the second amendment correctly, it is the infringement of the right to keep and bear arms that is the violation of the law. Why are you calling it "civil disobedience" to defend that right?
Jay Wye Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 8:55 AM
it's "civil disobedience" of an UNCONSTITUTIONAL law.
such laws have no authority,they are invalid.
Shoestring47 Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 9:31 AM
Obama has wiped his a** on the Constitution ever since he was put in office, from Chicago to Washington. He is a Marxist and nothing more.
Pistol Wrote: Jan 27, 2013 8:48 AM
Citizens living under a constitution with which they concur, have an individual responsibility to defend the constitution and the country it governs. We owe it to those who created and passed it to us, and to those to whom we wish to pass the same blessings.

I periodically share public opinion data, either because I’m encouraged by the results or because I think that the research helps show how to frame issues.

Examples include polling data on personal retirement accounts, the dangers of big government, support for spending caps, and viability of class warfare tax policy.

But I’ve been very narrowly focused. Just about all the polls I’ve shared have been about some...

Related Tags: Politicians