1 - 10 Next
In response to:

You Lie!

stereotypo Wrote: Nov 16, 2014 4:37 PM
Not merely lies, but blasphemies. For example, "The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down." However, 2 Corinthians 6:14-18: "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship has righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion has light with darkness? 15: And what concord has Christ with Belial? or what part has he that believes with an infidel? 16: And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? for you are the temple of the living God; as God has said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. 17: Wherefore come out from among them, and be separate, says the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, 18: And will be a Father unto you, and you shall be my sons and daughters, says the Lord Almighty." Now, under the Constitution, we have the right to believe that whether or not it is true. A Muslim has the right to believe the Koran whether or not it is true. But under Sharia, and under what Obama is working to implement, Muslims will have all the rights. Christianity can't freely exist without the walls Obama wants to tear down.
You have to admit that Gruber has a point about the intelligence of the American voter: They re-elected Clinton and they re-elected Obama. And look at California . . .
George Washington should be removed from being our 1st president, John Adams from being 2nd president, Thomas Jefferson, well, er uh, I guess he can be 1st . . .
"The first step is to define marriage." "The introduction of a deity or Guns or the Constitution are not requisite to defining marriage." O.K. So we leave out the Law of God, the law of man, and the means of enforcing any of these laws. By what criteria, then, should marriage be defined? the rule of the majority? by rule of a minority from the bench? The introduction of a deity or Guns or the Constitution after such definition will come into play, no?
Romans 1 outlines for us the moral decline of civilization. Redefinition of marriage is the penultimate stage, of which God has given up the society to, followed by that society desiring not to retain God in their knowledge and so God gives them up to a reprobate mind. In chapter 2 the question is "How shall you escape the judgment of God?" Evil thinks that its existence proves the non-existence of God. But it is a parasite not acknowledging its Host. Notwithstanding, evil is in the ascendency and judgment is the only remedy. We do not idly witness the collapse of our society and our country, but we do witness its collapse.
Yeah, if he is not her son, why is she speaking up for him?
Let's take a straw poll: Democrat straw donor - good; Republican straw donor - bad.
Democrat - good: Republican - bad.
". . . smoked sulfur and pigs. . " sounds good. I must have your recipe. Do you do this underground, like in a pit?
The first seduction was "you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil." Turned out that they only knew evil.
1 - 10 Next