In response to:

Obama, Rubio Birthers Should Read the Law

Stephen230 Wrote: May 30, 2012 4:35 PM
I'm sorry, Mr. York, but I disagree. You cite "the most reasonable reading" of the law. I am not an attorney, but I suggest to you that our founders inclusion of the language "natural born citizen" was intended specifically to prevent anyone with mixed loyalties--i.e. dual citizenship--from serving in the office of President or Vice President. If we accept Mr. Obama's obviously forged birth certificate as legitimate, irrespective of the fact that it states he was born in Hawaii, he was, by virtue of his father's British citizenship, a dual citizen, thus ineligible to serve as President or Vice President. In fact, by virtue of a law enacted in Kenya after it became a nation on it's own, Mr. Obama is now also a citizen of Kenya, as well.
Skipper13 Wrote: May 31, 2012 1:03 PM
I sure hope Byron is reading these comments. He would learn something I think......
gwharpo Wrote: May 30, 2012 6:15 PM
It appears that a corrupt Congress has too much invested in this traitor to do anything.

Birtherism -- the belief that Barack Obama was born in Kenya, not in the United States -- pretty much died last year when the White House released a copy of the president's long-form birth certificate showing he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961. After that, the number of Americans who doubted Obama's place of birth dropped dramatically.

But not to zero. In recent days, there has been a mini-resurgence of birther talk, from Arizona, where the secretary of state questioned Obama's eligibility to be on the ballot, to Iowa, where some Republicans want to require presidential candidates to prove...