In response to:

The Plot to Hide Al Qaeda's Role in the Deadly Sept. 11 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi

Stan_in_Texas Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 10:15 AM
I'm sure you know the answers to those questions but let me help others to understand. Stevens was there to support and fund and provide arms to al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations to overthrow Assad in Syria. He was unprotected because a large security detail would have drawn attention to what was really happening. Can't be covert and also visible. The warehouses stored arms and supplies for al Qaeda to use. Yes Stevens was supplying arms. Obama saw things unraveling and knew that a major response would just shed light on the convert mission so he decided to eliminate the evidence (or allow the attackers to eliminate it for him) No witnesses and no one with details of what was happening.
One of President Obama's national security boasts in the 2012 presidential election was that al Qaeda's ranks have been "decimated," they're "on the run," and "on the path to defeat."

So when the evil, terrorist network built by Osama bin Laden destroyed the U.S. consulate in Libya and killed our ambassador and three other officials on Sept. 11, it sent a chilling message that, contrary to Obama's preposterous claim, al Qaeda's very much alive and capable of killing Americans with impunity on U.S. soil.

Indeed, despite Obama's election-year claim that al Qaeda had been all but put out of...