In response to:

The Plot to Hide Al Qaeda's Role in the Deadly Sept. 11 Attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi

Stan_in_Texas Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 10:07 AM
Good article but it also misses the important part. THIS WAS NOT A CONSULATE. This was a meeting place for the ambassador to work WITH al Qaeda and provide material support (money and arms) to be used in Libya to overthrow Assad. This is a treasonous act!!!!! How can our government arm the enemy of the US? This is the reason there was no real security detail. Enough troops to adequately secure the MISSION (not consulate) would have drawn attention to the facility. This was a covert operation to arm our enemies in hopes that they would take out Assad. Wake up people!!!!!!!!
man of steel Wrote: Nov 21, 2012 8:26 PM
Do you really believe Obama had the stones to green light an operation like that 8 weeks before the election. You say wake up. I say dream on.
One of President Obama's national security boasts in the 2012 presidential election was that al Qaeda's ranks have been "decimated," they're "on the run," and "on the path to defeat."

So when the evil, terrorist network built by Osama bin Laden destroyed the U.S. consulate in Libya and killed our ambassador and three other officials on Sept. 11, it sent a chilling message that, contrary to Obama's preposterous claim, al Qaeda's very much alive and capable of killing Americans with impunity on U.S. soil.

Indeed, despite Obama's election-year claim that al Qaeda had been all but put out of...