In response to:

Candy Crowley: No Regrets on that Misleading Fact-Check In Front of 65 Million People

ssoucek Wrote: Dec 09, 2012 5:11 PM
You can tell by her responses in this interview that she was dancing around the issue and never gave a straight answer. She was clearly bias, can't admit that she was dead wrong, and made it easier for the president to get away with Benghazi b/c she tried to throw Romney off (heck, she threw me off) by unexpectedly "fact-checking" him while he was trying to prove a point. I remember being dumb-founded, asking "what did she just say??" I was second-guessing myself, and thought, no, he didn't call it a terrorist attack, did he? Also Romney tried to point out Fast and Furious in the debate, but she cut him off and gave a pass to the president by moving on to another suject. but what else did I expect from the most corrupt media ever?

On Friday, Hugh Hewitt asked CNN anchor Candy Crowley about her infamous fact-check heard 'round the world during the "town hall style" presidential debate at Hofstra University.  Her general self-assessment?  The journalistic equivalent of a solid B-plus:
 

HH: I have to begin by asking you about the debate, obviously, since it’s the first time I’ve talked to you since then. Looking back at not just your role but the media generally, are you happy with how it turned out? Is it pride, misgivings or both?

CC: Do you mean about the...

Thursday, May 23 | 07:50 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:50 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:50 PM ET
Thursday, May 23 | 07:50 PM ET