Is Hawkins becoming less of a moron in his commentary? His idiotic lists seem to be getting ever-so-slightly smarter. Numbers 1 and 3 are the only ones that hold any water, two is better than zero! And he included sources!
This is a good start. You should develop the lobbyist point and the web posting points a little more. Come on John, fight the urge to cater to the idiotic outrage of the rednecks on this site and develop an intelligent argument. We're counting on you. The future of conservatism is at stake.

Victory! Horray! The gays won’t be knocking on our doors and demanding to know why we hate them.

How is this a victory for traditional marriage? It seems more like a victory for anonymity/privacy. Are we that desperate for an opportunity to declare a victory that we have to reach THIS far? Does everything Bandes writes have to be dumb?

So is this single liberal blogger supposed to make us feel better about the flood of rubes on the conservative side advancing this theory? Grow up.

Does anybody know the FCC's rationale behind considering this regulation? That moron Bandes left that part out.

This is the 3rd time a TH writer has written a review of Bruno. Each time, the moron says right up front that they didn't see the movie. Gratuitious full-frontal nudity can be pretty offensive, but so is the idea that these TH idiots actually get paid for their opinions.

... as long as it makes our side look good
Your columns are almost as dumb as Jillian Bandes'. Why do you continue to repeat the canard that Anita Dunn loves Mao? Now, Dunn is a dunce for sure, but any idiot with an internet connection can see that her comment about Mao was a joke. Listen to the next few sentences.
But that's ok, you can say whatever you want. I wouldn't want your free speech to be chilled just because you can't help spreading idiotic falsehoods. After all, this column is just opinion, not news, right? You have no obligation to tell the truth.
Would you consider giving up writing? Your columns frequently embarrass conservatism.

Why are the wingnuts trying to convince me that volunteering is bad? Why do they seem to think "volunteering" will become mandatory? This column doesn't say.

I AM in the military, and I didn't say he was a traitor. I just said he was a liar, because he is. That isn't controversial.

Fellow teabaggers,
Don't be so quick to judge. If it wasn't for the ACLU, our beloved friend and terrorist Ollie North might be in prison rather than making us dumber with his TH columns. Don't take my word for it, see for yourself:

http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/21/us/civil-liberties-union- asks-court-to-quash-iran-contra-indictment.html?n=Top%2fRef erence%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fA%2fAmerican%20Ci vil%20Liberties%20Union

...not sure that facts matter to you, but here's the proof: http://www.nytimes.com/1988/07/21/us/civil-liberties-union -asks-court-to-quash-iran-contra-indictment.html?n=Top%2fRe ference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fA%2fAmerican%20C ivil%20Liberties%20Union