In response to:

Rotten to the Core (Part 2): Readin', Writin' and Deconstructionism

squiddy Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 12:40 PM
Professor Stotsky's comments hints at a real danger, here - this paves the way for a teacher to insert their own texts reflecting their own biases - for example, I recall a "Hispanic Literature" course whose readings consisted entirely of pro-Marxist, pro-revolutionary novels - and if you wanted to pass, your interpretations had better be that all South American governments were vicious, corrupt puppets of the US Government, and the only way to achieve justice was revolution and establishment of a Worker's Paradise. I understand utilitarianism, but not exposing students to works of timelessly great literature is a mistake - how will they ever understand what makes great literature "great", without reading and understanding it?
everyonesfacts4usall Wrote: Jan 25, 2013 2:48 PM
http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf See pp. 32+58 for their recommendations. They have a separate document with just readings

(This is the second part of an ongoing series on federal "Common Core" education standards and the corruption of academic excellence.)

The Washington, D.C., board of education earned widespread mockery this week when it proposed allowing high school students -- in the nation's own capital -- to skip a basic U.S. government course to graduate. But this is fiddlesticks compared to what the federal government is doing to eliminate American children's core knowledge base in English, language arts and history.

Thanks to the "Common Core" regime, funded with President Obama's stimulus dollars and bolstered by duped Republican governors and business groups, deconstructionism...