Previous 21 - 30 Next
In response to:

Cameras and More Cameras

sqrt(cos(180)) Wrote: Aug 19, 2014 11:58 PM
Really? I thought "Big Sister"...
In response to:

Cameras and More Cameras

sqrt(cos(180)) Wrote: Aug 19, 2014 11:57 PM
But that would be the #1 reason, wouldn't it? After all, police mostly deal with criminals (when not handing out traffic violations) and criminals lie. Worse, the fact the police deal mostly with criminals leads some of them to believe they can't trust anyone but another LEO.
In response to:

Random Thoughts

sqrt(cos(180)) Wrote: Aug 19, 2014 9:59 PM
Dr. Sowell is frequently hilarious--merely by telling the truth--but the last "random thought" is so funny I darn near burst a blood vessel laughing.
Watch the orginal movie "Red Dawn", or even the less-than-satisfying remake, to see a scenario of an armed citizenry defending itself. Sure, it's just a movie, but it is plausible considering the grit of those who own and regularly use rifles and pistols.
Only one comment so far...I think it's safe to say that NO ONE cares about Chris "The Tingling Leg" Matthews any more.
Unmentioned in the final blurb on the reboot of "Cosmos" was that the project was funded by Seth MacFarlane, comedian and creator of left-leaning animated show "Family Guy". Despite the quote from Dr. Tyson, he made several statements on the shows which demonstrate he is a proponent of AGW. Far from being an informative, science-based series, it was a paean to PC emotional propaganda--quite factual, but PC propaganda nonetheless.
Took me a couple of reads before I caught that "AP" stood for "advanced placement" rather than the better known news service, Always Propagandizing.
In response to:

'Do Nothing' Congress

sqrt(cos(180)) Wrote: Aug 06, 2014 12:18 AM
Amen. On today's Michigan ballot was an initiative to "repeal" a tax on business assets (to be "replaced" by allowing an "Authority" to figure out new means of taxing us differently--supposedly to be "revenue-neutral".) But it actually didn't repeal any law, instead it will "update" the existing law by replacing one phrase with another phrase, and so on, ad nauseum. I vote NO; just REPEAL the dang law if it's that bad, and stop passing laws stating an unelected, unanswerable "Authority" will regulate our new taxes. I want to look the blasted thieves in the eye when I vote them out of office!
In response to:

The Lie Behind DACA's Legal Defense

sqrt(cos(180)) Wrote: Aug 05, 2014 10:30 PM
What I saw was a couple of illegals attempting to flummox a conservative and failing miserably. They failed--refused actually--to answer any questions posed by Rep. King. King was asking probing questions and giving factual answers to every question posed him. The illegals blatantly lied about his positions, replied to all questions with a spume of emotional outbursts...rather like whiny 2-year olds having a screaming fit in public. Appalling.
I think it's eric who has the problem, not his "history"...Dewey would classify that as either fiction or fantasy, not history.
Why? And what "Plant" are you smoking?
Previous 21 - 30 Next