"Wow," indeed...Nana82 sure got her truth on!

We now have proof of the old adage, "You are what you eat." We also now know the name of the only person in the USA who never re-gifts the Christmas fruitcakes -- and actually EATS THEM!

"Heck, if they put everyone through the lengthy questioning I went through, there would be very few illegals in the country." True, but that would be terribly politically incorrect...and we can't have that, can we?

Islam is incompatible with any world that is not 100% Muslim. That is the nature of evil.

"From the Halls of Montezuma, TO THE SHORES OF TRIPOLI..." John, the "first wake-up call" (as Americans) was the Muslim Barbary Pirates who thought they were justified in preying upon non-Muslim shipping. If one actually makes any effort to learn about Islam, you find out that Islam preaches peace and tolerance only for Muslims, and intolerance for all others.

Really?!? I would definitely want the selective fire version...if it's good enough for the police, it's good enough for OTHER law-abiding citizens. But, it's against the law to have the same type weapon as the government would use on us, so, being a law-abiding citizen, I guess I'll just have to use something less.

Not sure I agree with you; Krugman is worse than either of them (or maybe even both of them put together.) Though I suppose you might say that Krugman is an economist rather than a journalist, and you were speaking strictly of journalists as opposed to columnists. Not that Krugman is much of an economist either.

News flash to Darned Nuts: the actual phrase is "presumed innocent," not just "innocent." I doubt many cons are as afraid of a civilian trial as the suspect is afraid of being put in "gen pop."

Yes, this is what happens when the DNC gets twitter accounts.

I would hope you mean "Nacht", as "Nauch" is a variant of "Nautch", an East Indian dance...