In response to:

In Defense of the National Organization For Marriage

Spikeygrrl Wrote: Apr 24, 2012 2:20 AM
[cont'd from above] ...even thousands, of emotionless one-night-stands and/or entering into "committed relationships" only with the stipulation that those relationships be "open" (which is just as heinous a design for living when practiced by opposite-sex couples, but fortunately it's MUCH less common there unless one or both opposite-sex partners are "guilted into it" by liberal/progressive/creeping-socialist "values").

The unfounded attacks and insults lodged against the National Organization for Marriage have increased recently by an ever ravenous opposition. The Humans Rights Campaign has shamelessly published NOMs confidential IRS records, and last month a federal judge unsealed some of NOM’s constitutionally protected internal reports.

Not surprisingly, those who seek to redefine marriage immediately seized upon the opportunity to attack NOM based on these documents with salacious accusations and vilifications.

NOM’s political adversaries have violently reacted to its efforts to leverage an inconvenient truth: African-Americans and Hispanics, as a community, generally reject same-sex “marriage.” They don’t see the redefinition of marriage...

Tuesday, June 18 | 05:16 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 05:16 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 05:16 PM ET
Tuesday, June 18 | 05:16 PM ET