1 - 3
you are assuming they 1) developed a good requirements analysis (or even know what one is) 2) programmed it to reflect the requirements (after all, they only had 3/4 of a Billion dollars!) 3) Are interested in Honestly providing that information to the public 4) ... blah blah blah. it;s the worst case of bad management and development i have ever seen!
In response to:

Fact-Free Liberals: Part IV

SpeedracerNow Wrote: Jan 24, 2014 1:21 PM
When engineers use flawed data then what they are buidling fails. When global alarmists use flawed data (and that has been proven) then their "theories" also fail. When Michael Crichton, a known left leaning scientist (as well as author), spoke to global warming, he stated multiple reasons why the theories were not only wrong, but laughable. The premise that man is creating a large portion of climate change is the first problem. You are working to prove your theory rather than use solid data to examine results. It is too easy to fusge data to make it fit your desired result - and that is what is being done to maintain the funding and notoriety.
In response to:

Stressed? Are You Disabled?

SpeedracerNow Wrote: Aug 20, 2012 9:31 AM
Disability is a funny thing. I am a paraplegic, in a wheelchair, but until now, I have been employed and making too much to be considered "disabled". I am now unemployed, over 50, and can't find work. I also would like to know how I can just go in to an unemployment office and say "sign me up". I knew one guy who claimed he was leaving the building from work one day when the door closed on him causing trouble to his back and pain. He eventually got disability. Whereas I, who have constant pain from my paralysis, am confined to a wheelchair, continued to work .... and pay for his "disability". Yeah, there are deserving people for disability, but you can't spot them anymmore for the jerks gaming the system. We need better requirements
1 - 3