One is given pause to wonder. The articles on which she posts usually top the site on number of postings, most of them either in response to some factless statement she offers up or (for reasons I've yet to fathom and will never condone) wishes for her demise. It may be easier to believe that she is a fictional character, posting here solely increase the comment count on certain articles - maybe paid on commission for the number of responses she garners. Although, I must confess, I have known some people who's lives are almost as screwed up as hers seems to be.

You may offer rebuttal in the form of citing the Article and Section or the Amendment in which it states "every citizen has the right to vote" or words to that effect. Evidence, not emotion, please.

"It does too say every citizen has the roight to vote" --- Saying something is so does not make it so. The Constitution, primarily through amendments, specifies what prohibitions cannot be used to prevent someone from voting. It leaves it to the States to determine eligibility. All states prohibit children under the age of 18, including those who are citizens. Many states prohibit felons, including those who are citizens. Some states prohibit the mentally disables, including those who are citizens. If it stated explicitly in the Constitution that EVERY citizen has the right to vote, ALL of those prohibitions would be unconstitutional. NONE of them are.

"What part of "Every citizen has the right to vote" ddont you understand? The constitution doesnt say "Every citizen with photo ID has the right to vote" --- The Constitution doesn't say "Every citizen has the right to vote" either. It specifies some instances where the right to vote cannot be abridged, but it leaves it to the States to determine eligibility. If a State determines that a photo ID is an eligibility requirement, it does not violate the Constitution as far as I can see. Side note: You constantly rail against Mitt Romney's faith. That does not disqualify him from holding office per Article VI, Seciton 3, US Constitution. Might want to choose another line of attack.

Clearly, voter ID laws discriminate against dead and imaginary people. Shameful. What happened to equal protection for the living impaired? Oh, and vampires...maybe.

Guam is still above water. It's almost as if there is a rock underneath the surface, holding it up.

If I recall, there was quite the fuss from the Left about "overturning the election" when Clinton's impeachment proceedings were under way. Why, then, do they support a recall of Scott Walker over policy issues? Isn't that "overturning the election"? Or is it simply that they don't want you to "overturn" THEIR candidate, but they have to qualms about "overturning" yours. Ah, Hypocrisy. Your logical contortionism never ceases to amaze.

I think Illinois Governers have their own wing at Joliet.

All that remains is for voters to go to the polls.

Ah, but she was describing her vision of what should be: people taxed for the sin of having things she does not. Envy is such a sad thing.