In response to:

Andrea Mitchell Corrects Guest Who Called Herself "Pro-Life": "Anti-Abortion Is More Value-Neutral"

SonofaVet Wrote: Jan 09, 2013 6:16 PM

Why do they insist on calling it "reproductive health" when most of these abortions have absolutely nothing to do with the "health" of the woman but everything to do with the death of the child? Why should choosing life be "value neutral"? Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. Titus 1:15-16

Join the Debate!

All comments and users are subject to Townhall's new comments policy.

Read Full Story

Andrea Mitchell Corrects Guest Who Called Herself "Pro-Life": "Anti-Abortion Is More Value-Neutral"

My (rhetorical) question is this: Why would a pro-abortion--or, "pro-choice" if you're looking for something more value neutral--advocate like Andrea Mitchell want the issue of life and death to be "value-neutral"?

Here's a little nugget I came across today from Pastor John MacArthur: "They keep saying, 'A school is supposed to be a safe place!' Yeah well so is a womb."