In response to:

The Old Rubber Cross

Solipslip Wrote: Apr 30, 2012 6:18 PM
of course you don't think you statements are contradictions, you though 'em up. Once more: 1) you say she implied that the condoms are a counterpoint to the crosses anti-abortion stance, thus=pro-abortion, g=females can do what they want with their bodies 2) next you say we can't infer any pro-abortion meaning from the condoms 3) lastly,you say perhaps she has pro-abortion proclivities, but we can't infer such from the condoms If you can't see it now, I can;t show you.

Dear President Ransdell:

As a supporter of Hilltoppers for Life, I am deeply concerned at the way its pro-life display was vandalized on April 20, 2012. I am perhaps more concerned with the way Western Kentucky University (WKU) officials have responded to this criminal action. As this story continues to unfold, the facts suggest that at least one WKU official knew in advance this vandalism would occur. Later, several officials did nothing to stop it. This is simply inexcusable in a climate of higher learning.

As you already know, Hilltoppers for Life erected approximately 3,700 crosses in order...