In response to:

Deadly Combination: Political Correctness in a Gun-Free Zone

Soho1950 Wrote: Sep 19, 2013 2:45 AM
Virtually every commentator and reporter on this story has displayed a striking lack of knowledge regarding the military justice system. There have been numerous expressions of incredulity that Alexis received an honorable discharge. What these folks fail to understand is that a dishonorable discharge is issued only as the result of a conviction by a court-martial for a specific criminal offense, and a "general, under honorable conditions" discharge is also usually the result of a specific serious infraction. Article 15 (non-judicial punishment) offenses such as those committed by Alexis normally have no bearing on the character of the discharge unless there is a determination made that the individual exhibits a clear pattern of unfitness for continued service - a determination that takes into account a number of factors, not merely disciplinary actions. Alexis may not have been a model sailor, but nothing reported in his military records would have earned him a dishonorable discharge.
SpiritInterface Wrote: Sep 19, 2013 5:34 AM
He could have been given a general discharge, or a less than honorable discharge.
Jeff3256 Wrote: Sep 19, 2013 7:23 AM
It was not honorable. Elder, altho' right 99.9% of the time, got this one wrong.
Soho1950 Wrote: Sep 19, 2013 12:12 PM
It was honorable. He was originally processed for a general, but it was upgraded to honorable.
Ref: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/17/honorable-discharge-navy-yard-shooter-who-had-patt/

also: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2013/09/17/navy-yard-gunman-had-honorable-discharge.html