In response to:

Don't Blame Romney

snuffy88 Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 9:47 PM
How many self-identified Christians sat at home because they "couldn't bring themselves to vote for someone who did not believe like them?" Romney was a fine candidate. Did their short-sightedness cost the election? We were voting for a commander-in-chief, not a pastor-in-chief. God knew the choice we had. As Christians, I believe it is our moral duty to vote. Our service men and women fought for this privilege; we ought to exercise it.
kcurry Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 10:07 PM
Too many self-identified Christians period. Who aren't.
pastorial Wrote: Nov 10, 2012 12:18 PM
what is a self-identified christian?
Gayle__CO Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 9:54 PM
It was stated on the O'Reilly Factor tonight that there were 8 million fewer Republican votes for Romney as compared to McCain in 2008. I believe you are correct in your assessment of the short-sightedness of self-identified Christians. Talk about cutting off the nose to spite the face.
IsraelFirsterSecond Wrote: Nov 07, 2012 10:18 PM
It was 8 million less for Obama. 2 million less for Romney.

We spent billions of dollars and billions of words on an election to switch from President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House to President Obama, a Democratic Senate and a Republican House.

Every election predictor was wrong, except one: Incumbents usually win.

Republicans have taken out a sitting president only once in the last century, and that was in 1980 when Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter. Sadly, Reagan's record remains secure.

The Democrats ran up against the incumbency problem in 2004. The landslide election for Democrats in 2006 suggests that Americans were not thrilled with...

Related Tags: Mitt Romney Barack Obama