In response to:

Philadelphia Came out in Astronomical Numbers for Obama

snookems Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 8:59 PM
Folks, we've all heard it said by many of the card-carrying members of the Republican Party here that Ronald Wilson Reagan created conditions that led to decades of growth. Now, here's a question to all my Republican friends. Couldn't the eight year George W. Bush 'Reign of Error' have left this country in such a state that economic conditions will be poor for quite some time?
Joe706 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 10:17 PM
Possibly, but you could see the start of that recovery within two years of his taking office. The recession ended within a year after Obama took office and the economy has been stagnant since. In four more years we will see if you're right. I will be more than happy to admit I'm wrong if the economy comes roaring back in the next four years, but if we're still seeing 7 to 9% unemployment, and the median income continues to drop (dropped $4,100 over the last 4 yrs), and we're still sticking future generations with approximately one trillion dollars in debt, will you admit you're wrong?
Petrus64 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 9:03 PM
hey ray ancel, saw you posting on facebook. you do get around. Just as dumb anywhere as well.
Stan306 Wrote: Nov 11, 2012 9:02 PM
If Obama didn't have Bush... could you even see the President?

In Philadelphia President Obama won the city with 85% of the vote, but in 13 precincts he won 99% or more. This vote is mostly due to the large African American populations in these wards. Obama carried these same ones in 2008.

Even though many voters were not as enthusiastic to vote this year, these wards in Philadelphia managed to be just as excited to vote for Obama.

"In this election, you had to point out to the people what was at stake. And in many cases, they felt that the Romney doctrine was not going to favor the working...

Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET