In response to:

Surprise: Elizabeth Warren Can’t Define What the Phrase “Middle Class” Means

Snarkasterous1 Wrote: Jan 06, 2013 11:03 AM
Too bad that Warren's "Pee-Paw" - you know, the old gentleman whose photo on her mantle was commented upon "thousands of times" by Warren's Aunt Bea, who remarked upon Pee-Paw's high cheekbones. I'll bet "Pee-Paw" could have actually answered the question! Warren - a pathetic fraud who milked the libbie affirmative action guilt train, and lacks even the fundamental decency to admit that that's what she did. Look at her! When you see this pasty, entitled, hard-left libbie, does Harvard trumpeting her as a "Woman of Color" make you want to retch? This is what libbie affirmative action produces - the entitled benefitting by getting preferences unearned and undeserved. God forbid that they should have to compete on their own merit!

President Obama -- along with many of the liberal Democrats in Congress -- originally defined “the rich” as couples making more than $250,000 a year. They were very specific and emphatic about how this group of taxpayers needs to pay their “fair share.” Yet, when one of the Senate’s newest -- and one of the most liberal -- members was asked to define what income groups comprise the “middle class,” she simply couldn’t do it. How remarkable:

"It’s not a numbers issue. I know you would expect a very wonky answer from me…When...