As soon as each and every entitlement available to illegal aliens and anchor baby families are stopped for good we can talk about amnesty of some form. Not until then.
I say first make a requirement that a child born in the USA is a citizen only if the parent(s) is/are.
On Saturday I will be debating Mark Kirkorian on immigration policy before the National Review Institute.
I am a "wet," on the topic. Have been since I opposed California's proposition 187 in 1994.
Mark, the executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, is a "dry."
Here's the interesting thing about out "debate," to be moderated by National Review's Jim Geraghty: Even if one or the other of us succeeds in persuading everyone in the room of our point of view, it doesn't matter. Not a lick. The GOP is branded as an anti-immigrant party, especially with voters under 30, the...
That was the actual intention with the 14th amendment that dealt established US citizenship. Too bad the Feds didn't see fit to enforce it, particularly in recent years.
Thats what we are seeing here.
No one wants to do anything but text what cereal they had for breakfast!
Comprehensive means surrender! Immigration reform means surrender and all the rhetoric is just an attempt to put lipstick on a pig!
It appears Americans have become too weak kneed to even talk about controversial things. Americans today are afraid of any criticism from any directions. And they are not feeling too comfortable about being safe from their own Government!