In response to:

White House Silent as Benghazi Questions Mount

Smitty41inPB Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 10:38 AM
It was a mission obama was using to funnel guns to the rebels to overthrow qaddafi, and when al queda started sending the weapons to syria he sent stevens in unprotected to get them back because the russians were about to blow the story. Unbeknownst to stevens he was being inserted as bait to be kidnapped in order to make obama a hero at the last minute, and when request to help went out the orders to stand down were given lest they foil the plan, but 2 former seals not knowing the plan fought back.
Smitty41inPB Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 10:38 AM
Brave men and women of purpose go in knowing they my risk their lives to serve their country. They do so knowing the effects of their work are necessary so lesser people can lead normal lives in the peace and comfort they provide. What they don't do is go in blindly risking all because their safely ensconced bosses have hung them out to dry. Now that we know obama obandoned them to win an election ALL people of conscience should be outraged and it will be apparent they are when the votes are tallied.
Smitty41inPB Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 10:39 AM
what say u liberals when u r the fools fodder?
djandle88 Wrote: Nov 01, 2012 11:45 AM
Liberals don't have to have a conscience!

Last week, we alerted you to the infuriating, heart-wrenching revelation that at least three specific requests for military help from besieged Americans in Benghazi were rejected by someone in the chain of command.  This decision was made despite the established fact that US officials in Tripoli, the State Department, the Pentagon and the White House were watching the horror unfold in real time, via a video feed from an unmanned drone hovering over the city.  Democrats won't say if that drone was armed (and therefore capable of raining fire on the terrorists who were...