Serious question: How on earth could anyone oppose a policy that would effectively give low-skilled workers (workers who barely make enough money to feed themselves, let alone a family), higher wages? After all, we live in difficult economic times, and it doesn’t seem wholly unreasonable that individuals working in low-skilled jobs should be entitled to a minimum, universally agreed upon standard of living. And indeed, as you might expect, this isn’t by any means an unpopular idea: According to a recent Gallup poll, almost all the Democrats -- and precisely half the Republicans -- surveyed would vote “for” a proposal...
fine, if the government wants to define what the private market must pay a worker, then decide appropriately because that will be the new maximum that a federal worker is allowed to be paid. To ensure a proper and fair balance all income will be taxed at the same rate up to the level equal with 2000 hrs times the hourly rate and that rate will be 1/2 the rate of all income above that threshhold. Say the wage is 20/hr, 1 dollar up to 40000, which all minimum wage earners and federal employees would make, being taxed at 15%, any income over 40k gets taxed at 30%. I'm sure the feds would soon see the error of their ways. All federal giveaway programs go by the wayside also, States that wish to continue any such programs or tax programs are on
- Hmm: Tsarnaev sister arrested for alleged bomb threat Mary Katharine Ham 28 mins ago
- Infographic of the day: Canada explains Russia and Not Russia to Putin Mary Katharine Ham 1 hour ago
- FBI: Russians hackers attacked Wall Street after sanctions imposed Noah Rothman 2 hours ago
- Texas jury finds dad not guilty in mysterious shooting of drunk driver who killed his two sons Allahpundit 2 hours ago
- Unidentified senator to Kirsten Gillibrand: “Don’t lose too much weight now. I like my girls chubby.” Allahpundit 3 hours ago
- Liberal magazine cautions journalists WH playing them with shutdown fears, is ignored Noah Rothman 4 hours ago