1 - 10 Next
What an absolute sack of lying BS. The prez has ABSOLUTE discretion as to who to prosecute. See SC decision Nixon v United states, 1974. The prez could prosecute every con in the country for being unpatriotic traitors if he wished. So deferring prosecution to illegal aliens is not even a stretch. The dept of homeland security is authorized to issue work permits, so that lie falls also. Cons are pathological liars. "Obama is a Muslim". "Obama's birth certificate is a fake". Kids from central america are carrying ebola". "There are death panels in the ACA". Anyone who believes anything the cons say is an idiot.
Just more BS from right wingnuts. There is no amnesty. There was no amnesty. There never will be any amnesty from the prez. He is lawfully doing things within his executive power.
Anyone who mentions "amnesty" in conjunction with illegal aliens as already LYING. The prez has never issued amnesty to illegal aliens. The prez will never issue amnesty to illegal aliens. Its not within his power. But because the cons wouldn't give him any new judges to handle the huge backlog of immigration cases, he expedited cases for those with criminal backgrounds.and deferred prosecution for those with no criminal history. And to be eligible for this they had to have been here for at least 5 yrs. The prez has also deported more illegal aliens than any prez in history. And anyone who relies on Faux Nooz for anything is an idiot.
The election results don't mean squat. Go look at midterm election results for the last 100 years, and you will see the same thing almost every time. The incumbent party in the WH loses seats in the senate and house. Today, the cons have no agenda whatsoever. They are in complete disarray. The comedy freak show they generate over the next two years will keep us all entertained. .
By that standard, the conviction and jailing of Don Seigelman in Alabama was overzealous, but he was jailed anyway. So now its Perry's turn to go to jail.
I wouldn't disagree with the statement that cons are revolting.
This don't mean squat. The two judges out of three are repigs, and now the decision is headed for a full court review, where the dems hold a majority. It won't stand. And the decision itself is not based on logic, its based on politics.
He should not be tried by the public. Let them finish their investigation first. And its no surprise that no one has come forward, they all would have left the military by now.
With jobs in the WH being government jobs, the job descriptions and pay are set by Congress, not the WH. Just another pack of lies with not a shred of truth. .
More attention and hearings have been done on Benghazi than all these others put together; January 22, 2002; US Consulate at Kolkata, 5 killed June 14, 2002 US Consulate at Karachi, 12 killed February 28, 2003; US Embassy at Islamabad, 2 killed. June 30, 2004 US Embassy at Tashkent, 2 killed December 6, 2004 US Compound at Saudi Arabia, 9 killed March 2, 2006 US Consulate in Karachi, 2 Killed September 12, 2006: US Embassy at Syria, 4 killed March 18, 2008: US Consulate at Yemen, 2 killed July9, 2008 US Consulate at Istanbul, 6 killed September 17, 2008 US embassy at Yemen, 16 killed Total Deaths: 60 The repigs and teabuggers are clearly ranting about Benghazi for only 1 reason.
1 - 10 Next