In response to:

Reactions of Liberals to the Obamacare Oral Arguments

SkepticN Wrote: Apr 03, 2012 8:55 AM
When liberal justices encourage the consideration of laws and judicial decisions from other countries in their deliberations of constitutionality, how is that any different than accepting the views of an outside commentator?

Heading into the oral arguments in the ObamaCare case last week, it seemed that Liberals thought the case was in the bag. Their attitude was, as Nancy Pelosi once stated, when brushing off a question about whether the individual mandate is constitutional, “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

Things apparently did not turn out as Liberals had expected at the oral arguments.

Almost immediately after the oral arguments had concluded, Liberals began expressing their shock that the Supreme Court might actually invalidate all or part of ObamaCare. It was as if the thought had never crossed their minds.

The initial...

Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET
Sunday, May 19 | 10:46 AM ET