In response to:

Report: Director of National Intelligence Swiped al Qaeda From Post Benghazi Talking Points

Six04 Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 2:58 PM
QUESTION: Idiot writes: "What exactly did I miss when you posted...." ANSWER: That there is a clear difference between an opinion and an intelligence estimate.
Libs_Are_UsefulIdiots Wrote: Nov 20, 2012 3:23 PM
Ah ha...

What part of KNOWLEDGEABLE and INFORMED OPINION, don't you get???

Do you know who David Petraeus is? Do you know what David Petraeus' back ground and knowledge base is?

Obviously YOU DON'T.

David Petraeus has more KNOWLEDGE and INFORMATION, ALL FIRST HAND, btw, than YOU could begin to imagine.

How insufferably STUPID of you to think that Petraeus' OPINION is WORTH MORE than yours, and perhaps anyone else in the Obozo admin.

We're getting warmer. As Guy pointed out yesterday, General David Petraeus told the White House immediately after the 9/11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that he believed the attack was carried out by al Qaeda affiliated terrorists. In his memo about the attack, Petraeus used the words "al Qaeda" to explain the situation. When UN Ambassador Susan Rice appeared on five Sunday shows five days after the attack to blame a YouTube video, she didn't refer to terrorism or al Qaeda. After Petraeus' testimony in front of Congress last week, we learned the talking points given to Susan...